The highest court in the country decided to hear the case in April.
The case will turn on the legal question of whether the Court of Appeals properly exercised jurisdiction over the case that revolves around the Constitution’s 11th Amendment and states’ rights.
The proposed $1 billion, 110-mile natural gas pipeline from Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, would cross the Delaware River north of Milford, then parallel the river through western Hunterdon County before ending at Transco’s trans-continental pipeline near Pennington in Mercer County.
Federal law gives pipeline companies like PennEast the legal power of eminent domain to go to court to purchase land for their projects.
PennEast hailed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case.
“We remain hopeful that after hearing full arguments this term, the U.S. Supreme Court will agree that the Third Circuit’s decision was profoundly wrong,” Tony Cox, chair of PennEast’s board of managers, said in a statement.
Cox said the court’s decision “is a major step forward in upholding Congress’ clear charge to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to ensure the availability of affordable domestic energy, delivered safely and reliably via natural gas infrastructure.”
Cox said the “misguided” Court of Appeals decision “turned nearly 80 years of federal government interpretation and industry practice on their heads.”
Cox said PennEast will continue working to obtain approvals from Pennsylvania regulators.
“We continue to work with all regulators to move the project forward, and meet the well-established needs of our customers,” Cox said, adding the first phase of the project could be completed in 2022.
Environmentalists have opposed the project since it was unveiled in 2014.
“We need our highest court to reaffirm to fossil fuel companies that they do not have the ability to trample over the rights of the state to protect its natural resources for the benefit of its communities,” Maya van Rossum, leader of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, a leading opponent of the pipeline, said in a statement. “While we believe the PennEast Pipeline Co. was premature in taking the case before the Supreme Court, we have confidence in the court to make the right decision and protect the sovereign immunity of the states.”
Van Rossum said the Supreme Court decision is key to protecting the rights of states.
“The law is clear, and the 11th Amendment protects New Jersey from seizures by private companies using eminent domain,” van Rossum continued. “The Supreme Court should uphold the Third Circuit ruling and protect states from federal overreach. States’ rights have been under constant assault throughout the Trump administration, and even now, the information before the court includes Trump’s Solicitor General’s legally flawed brief that desperately attempts to bolster PennEast. I doubt the current administration would put the rights of a fossil fuel company before the rights of the states.”
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.